Close
Join 237,000 weekly readers and receive practical marketing advice for FREE.
MarketingSherpa's Case Studies, New Research Data, How-tos, Interviews and Articles

Enter your email below to join thousands of marketers and get FREE weekly newsletters with practical Case Studies, research and training, as well as MarketingSherpa updates and promotions.

 

Please refer to our Privacy Policy and About Us page for contact details.

No thanks, take me to MarketingSherpa

First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Text HTML
Aug 05, 2008
Article

New Chart: Email Recipients Give New Meaning to ‘Spam’: 3 Takeaways

SUMMARY: Many more email recipients are hitting the ‘spam’ or ‘junk’ button for ‘legitimate’ emails simply because the content does not interest them. As a result, they are giving a new definition to spam without worrying about the consequences to senders with excellent reputations, products and marketing practices.
New Chart: 5 Reasons Recipients Hit 'Spam' or 'Junk' Button

View Chart Online
Click here to see larger, printable version of this chart

Late last year, MarketingSherpa fielded a study with Q Interactive to a very interesting population: people who had recently hit the ‘Report SPAM’ or ‘Junk’ buttons in their respective email clients (AOL, MSN or Yahoo!). We explored how these buttons get used, the perceptions of spam and the effect on “legitimate” email marketers. Why the quotation marks around the word legitimate? Because the defining theme of the study is that, in the eyes of more recipients, many opt-in mailers are merciless spammers.

This chart details the reasons why people hit the ‘spam’ or ‘junk’ buttons over a 30-day period. Notably, the second most cited reason – The email I received was not of interest to me – has nothing to do with permission or responsible mailing practices. The content simply wasn’t compelling so the recipient simply wrote off the mailer.

Inbox overload – the #1 challenge as ranked by more than 2,000 respondents to our last survey – is cited by 20% as a reason for hitting the spam button. As filters get better, the competition for eyeballs is going to be less with vendors of romantic pharmacology than with other legitimate emailers.

Key takeaways:

1. Email marketers who cling to mailing practices that emphasize list quantity over quality will face increasing deliverability challenges.

2. Tracking email reputation requires more than an occasional check from a free service. MarketingSherpa and PivotalVeracity conducted a study in late 2007 confirming that those emailers receiving high reputation scores from one or more free services were not immune to being mistakenly blocked or placed in the bulk folder.

3. Recipients define spam by the quality of the email itself – not by the overall reputation of the company emailing them. They’re not worried about how hitting the ‘spam’ button will affect your organization. So, consumers view ‘spammers’ as a much larger group than most marketers do, including many mailers with excellent brands and marketing practices.

Useful links related to this article

Not a Subscriber to Sherpa's Chart of the Week? Click Here to Get a New Chart Delivered to Your Inbox Every Tuesday!
http://s-ivp0s-42988.sgizmo.com


More Research Data from Sherpa:
https://www.marketingsherpa.com/membertour.html?view=re
earch


MarketingSherpa Email Marketing Benchmark Guide 2008:
http://www.sherpastore.com/EmailBenchmarkGuide08-newbut
on.html



See Also:

Comments about this Article

Aug 07, 2008 - Tommy Bourboulis of Stratford Career Institute says:
I am sure you are aware of the recent issues that legitimate mailers have been having with Yahoo Mail deliverability unfortunately I can't seem to find any information on the Marketing Sherpa website concerning Yahoo's use of DKIM and their recent filtering problems. We personally witnessed this Yahoo problem back in February and are still seeing remnants of it. This problem of course being the recent filtering/DKIM changes at Yahoo.


Aug 11, 2008 - Robert Kenney of NARS Cosmetics says:
One other reason was left out - companies which require a login to an account to unsubscribe. This is a completely unethical barrier to unsubscribing, yet a practice of some of the largest online companies, such as PayPal/eBay, Ticketmaster and many others. Trustee and other privacy groups should make the ability to unsubscribe *without logging into an account* a requirement for all member companies.



Post a Comment

Note: Comments are lightly moderated. We post all comments without editing as long as they
(a) relate to the topic at hand,
(b) do not contain offensive content, and
(c) are not overt sales pitches for your company's own products/services.










To help us prevent spam, please type the numbers
(including dashes) you see in the image below.*

Invalid entry - please re-enter




*Please Note: Your comment will not appear immediately --
article comments are approved by a moderator.

Improve your marketing

Join our thousands of weekly Case Study readers. Enter your email address below to receive MarketingSherpa news, updates, and promotions:
Note: Already a subscriber? Want to add a subscription?
Click Here to Manage Subscriptions