|
SUMMARY: Everyone knows that relevant and high-quality content can improve your site's natural search traffic. However, hosting too much of a good thing on a single page can cause unexpected problems.
See how one online retailer added loads of content to product pages, and made them the most-trafficked pages on its site -- even after they were buried in search results for high-volume terms. Also see why the team suspects Google penalized its pages, and how it used long-tail keywords to help survive the Google penalty. |
After reading the article, what stuck with me most is the fact that there changes to o URL, URL structure for its webpages, and Visual design. These could have HUGE impact on SEO (and likely did), even if handled properly. There is no discussion about if/how those changes were mitigated for search, and these are critical factors. In addition, I find that Mr. Johnson has a narrow view of what he calls "a cold algorithm standpoint" - very narrow as many critical elements, such as the ones above, off-page factors and inbound links, etc. were left out of the discussion. I highly doubt a "pentalty" is in play here, considering there is still some high rankings, and other terms have page 2 or 3 rankings, this signals to me that fundamental mistakes were made with regard to SEO when relaunching the web site.