|
SUMMARY: How much free content should your visitors be able to access? The Financial Times shared how they got the right access model to boost online subscriptions by 9% in 2008 – the year the US was in a recession.
What’s interesting about this Case Study is that it quashes the belief that giving more access to free content is best. On the contrary, it can inhibit visitors from purchasing subscriptions. |
Nonsense. The FT's ability to grow paid subscriptions does not quash "the belief that giving more access to free content is best." These results merely underscore what has long been understood by those who live in this space: you can only charge for very special, deep, high-demand content around topics like sports and investing content. It is a dangerous leap to infer that, by following these five tactics, a general-content site like newspaper.com can begin selling access. Newspapers need to invest HEAVILY in building deep, exclusive, passion-arousing premium content before even considering imposed barriers that narrow audiences we are just now learning how to target for advertisers at premium rates. Paid access is a terrible idea that has failed often for general-news publishers. It is unreasonable to pursue something like this without investing the requisite resources to build value around the content in categories that people will pay to access.